Ukastle forums http://www.ukastle.co.uk/discussion/ |
|
Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! http://www.ukastle.co.uk/discussion/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=401 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | mazeteam [ Sat May 05, 2012 1:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
Due to a tiebreaker in the normal round you all now have an additional 48 hours to cast your votes for either of the two tied images: Voting will end late sunday night/monday morning. |
Author: | nick217 [ Sun May 06, 2012 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
Number 5 should be Number 4... |
Author: | Phosco152 [ Sun May 06, 2012 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
Well no actually, the tie round is correct. PM Alex for further details if you require them. |
Author: | mazeteam [ Mon May 07, 2012 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
we could do with 1 more vote! |
Author: | mazeteam [ Wed May 09, 2012 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
Thank you to everybody who entered images and/or voted - the votes of both voting rounds have been checked and confirmed. by one vote, image 3 has been cast as the winning photo and will be on the homepage. |
Author: | Urbis Saturn Land [ Wed May 09, 2012 10:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
nick217 wrote: I've only noticed this too, as photos 3 and 4 got the same amount of votes. Where as photos 5 and 1 one one vote each, therefore how can photo number 5 automatcally qualify for the tie breaker round when it it only got one vote - doesn't make any sense. |
Author: | Alex [ Wed May 09, 2012 11:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Photo Of The Season - Spring 2012 Quick-Voting Round! |
Urbis Saturn Land wrote: nick217 wrote: I've only noticed this too, as photos 3 and 4 got the same amount of votes. Where as photos 5 and 1 one one vote each, therefore how can photo number 5 automatcally qualify for the tie breaker round when it it only got one vote - doesn't make any sense. It was due to rule B4. Therefore, the poll results shown on the original thread do not fully depict the real outcome - apologies for the confusion! |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |